mouthwash: be at dentist office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.67
, medication
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, preparation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lotion
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, detergent
Weight: 0.36
, ibuprofen
Weight: 0.36
, shampoo
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at dentist office 1.00
be at dentist 0.96
be at doctor 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(medication, be at doctor)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at dentist office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(medication, be at doctor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(medication, be at doctor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(medication, be at doctor)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, be at dentist office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mouthwash, be at dentist office)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, be at dentist)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at dentist)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at dentist)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(mouthwash, be at dentist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at dentist office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at dentist office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(medication, be at doctor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mouthwash, be at dentist office)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(medication, be at doctor)