mouthwash: be at drug store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.67
, medication
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, preparation
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lotion
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, detergent
Weight: 0.36
, ibuprofen
Weight: 0.36
, shampoo
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drug store 1.00
be at store 0.79
be at drugstore 0.79
be at grocery store 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at drug store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at drug store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be at grocery store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(detergent, be at store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(detergent, be at store)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(deodorant, be at grocery store)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be at grocery store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(mouthwash, be at drug store)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, be at drugstore)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drugstore)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mouthwash, be at drugstore)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at drugstore)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mouthwash, be at drug store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(detergent, be at store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(deodorant, be at grocery store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(mouthwash, be at drug store)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)