movie star: is attractive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.74
, celebrity
Weight: 0.73
, famous person
Weight: 0.68
, film
Weight: 0.65
Siblings horror movie
Weight: 0.40
, rock star
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is attractive 1.00
is very attractive 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(movie star, is attractive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is attractive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(movie star, is attractive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is very attractive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is very attractive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(movie star, is very attractive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(movie star, is very attractive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(movie star, is attractive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(movie star, is attractive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(movie star, is very attractive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(movie star, is very attractive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(movie star, is very attractive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(movie star, is very attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(movie star, is attractive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(movie star, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(movie star, is attractive)