movie theatre: serve nachos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, entertainment
Weight: 0.61
, establishment
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings movie theater
Weight: 0.38
, horror movie
Weight: 0.37
, movie screen
Weight: 0.36
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.36
, cinema
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
serve nachos 1.00
serve popcorn 0.84
is popcorn good 0.75
is popcorn 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is popcorn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is popcorn good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is popcorn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is popcorn good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(movie theater, is popcorn good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(movie theater, is popcorn good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cinema, is popcorn)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cinema, is popcorn)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(movie theater, is popcorn)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(movie theater, is popcorn)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(cinema, is popcorn good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cinema, is popcorn good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(movie theatre, serve nachos)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve popcorn)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(movie theatre, serve popcorn)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, is popcorn)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(movie theatre, serve popcorn)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(movie theatre, serve popcorn)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, is popcorn good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(movie theatre, is popcorn)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movie theatre, is popcorn)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(movie theatre, is popcorn)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(movie theatre, is popcorn good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(movie theatre, is popcorn good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(movie theatre, is popcorn good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(movie theatre, serve nachos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cinema, is popcorn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(movie theater, is popcorn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cinema, is popcorn good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, serve nachos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie theater, is popcorn good)