moving: be in word hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, operation
Weight: 0.50
, change
Weight: 0.48
, action
Weight: 0.47
Siblings move
Weight: 0.32
, pushing
Weight: 0.32
, buying
Weight: 0.31
, ground rent
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in word hard 1.00
be in word 0.92
is hard 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, is hard)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(moving, be in word hard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(change, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(change, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, is hard)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(moving, be in word hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(moving, be in word hard)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(moving, be in word)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(moving, be in word)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(moving, be in word)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(moving, is hard)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(moving, is hard)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(moving, be in word hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(moving, be in word hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(change, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(moving, be in word hard)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(change, is hard)