mud: be at rug

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debris
Weight: 0.61
, matter
Weight: 0.57
, object
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
Siblings dirt
Weight: 0.35
, silt
Weight: 0.34
, sand
Weight: 0.33
, boulder
Weight: 0.32
, gravel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rug 1.00
be at carpet 0.87
be at under carpet 0.84
be at old carpet 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be at rug)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be at carpet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be at under carpet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dirt, be at old carpet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dirt, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dirt, be at rug)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(dirt, be at carpet)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dirt, be at carpet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(dirt, be at under carpet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(dirt, be at under carpet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(dirt, be at old carpet)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(dirt, be at old carpet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(mud, be at rug)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mud, be at rug)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dirt, be at rug)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dirt, be at carpet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dirt, be at under carpet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mud, be at rug)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dirt, be at old carpet)