mud: feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debris
Weight: 0.61
, matter
Weight: 0.57
, object
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
Siblings dirt
Weight: 0.35
, silt
Weight: 0.34
, sand
Weight: 0.33
, boulder
Weight: 0.32
, gravel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel good 1.00
has quality good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dirt, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(gravel, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(gravel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(gravel, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dirt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(dirt, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mud, feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mud, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(mud, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mud, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mud, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mud, feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mud, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dirt, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mud, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(gravel, has quality good)