mud: is heterogeneous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debris
Weight: 0.61
, matter
Weight: 0.57
, object
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
Siblings dirt
Weight: 0.35
, silt
Weight: 0.34
, sand
Weight: 0.33
, boulder
Weight: 0.32
, gravel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is heterogeneous 1.00
is heterogeneous mixture 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gravel, is heterogeneous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dirt, is heterogeneous mixture)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(gravel, is heterogeneous mixture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(gravel, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gravel, is heterogeneous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(dirt, is heterogeneous mixture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dirt, is heterogeneous mixture)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(gravel, is heterogeneous mixture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gravel, is heterogeneous mixture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mud, is heterogeneous)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mud, is heterogeneous mixture)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mud, is heterogeneous mixture)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mud, is heterogeneous mixture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous mixture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mud, is heterogeneous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gravel, is heterogeneous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dirt, is heterogeneous mixture)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mud, is heterogeneous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(gravel, is heterogeneous mixture)