multiplication: be called operation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, mathematics
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, function
Weight: 0.52
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.33
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.32
, subtraction
Weight: 0.32
, ordinal number
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called operation 1.00
be called elementary operation 0.84
has state operations 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(subtraction, has state operations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(subtraction, has state operations)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(subtraction, has state operations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(multiplication, be called operation)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(multiplication, be called elementary operation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(multiplication, be called elementary operation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(multiplication, be called elementary operation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(multiplication, has state operations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(multiplication, be called elementary operation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(multiplication, has state operations)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(multiplication, has state operations)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(multiplication, has state operations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(multiplication, be called operation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(multiplication, be called operation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(multiplication, be called operation)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(subtraction, has state operations)