mummification: was important to egyptians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.49
, custom
Weight: 0.45
, aspect
Weight: 0.43
, practice
Weight: 0.41
, thing
Weight: 0.40
Siblings decomposition
Weight: 0.31
, fermentation
Weight: 0.31
, embalming
Weight: 0.31
, digestion
Weight: 0.30
, extraction
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to egyptians 1.00
be important to egyptians 0.97
was important to ancient egyptians 0.89
was used by egyptians 0.88
was important to egytians 0.86
be important to ancient egyptians 0.86
was used by ancient egyptians 0.84
be important to egypt 0.81
was important to ancient egytians 0.80
was in egypt used 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(embalming, was important to egyptians)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(embalming, was important to ancient egyptians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(embalming, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(embalming, was important to egyptians)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(embalming, was important to ancient egyptians)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(embalming, was important to ancient egyptians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mummification, be important to egyptians)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mummification, was used by egyptians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mummification, be important to egyptians)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mummification, be important to egyptians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mummification, was important to ancient egyptians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mummification, was used by egyptians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mummification, be important to egyptians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mummification, was used by egyptians)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mummification, was important to egytians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mummification, was in egypt used)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mummification, was used by ancient egyptians)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mummification, be important to ancient egyptians)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mummification, was used by ancient egyptians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mummification, was important to ancient egyptians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mummification, was in egypt used)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mummification, be important to egypt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mummification, was important to ancient egyptians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mummification, was used by ancient egyptians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mummification, was important to egytians)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mummification, was in egypt used)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mummification, was important to egytians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was in egypt used)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mummification, was important to ancient egytians)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mummification, be important to ancient egyptians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mummification, be important to egypt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mummification, be important to ancient egyptians)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mummification, be important to egypt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mummification, be important to egypt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to ancient egyptians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to egytians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mummification, was important to ancient egytians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was used by egyptians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mummification, was important to ancient egytians)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mummification, be important to ancient egyptians)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was used by ancient egyptians)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to ancient egytians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mummification, was important to egyptians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(embalming, was important to egyptians)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mummification, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(embalming, was important to ancient egyptians)