murder: be in theaters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.69
, crime
Weight: 0.64
, felony
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.62
, evil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honor killing
Weight: 0.69
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.63
, stabbing
Weight: 0.47
, homicide
Weight: 0.37
, rape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in theaters 1.00
be bad in movies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in theaters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rape, be bad in movies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(murder, be in theaters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rape, be bad in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(rape, be bad in movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(murder, be in theaters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(murder, be in theaters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(murder, be in theaters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(murder, be in theaters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in theaters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(murder, be in theaters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(murder, be in theaters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in theaters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(rape, be bad in movies)