murder: have entertaining videos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.69
, crime
Weight: 0.64
, felony
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.62
, evil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honor killing
Weight: 0.69
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.63
, stabbing
Weight: 0.47
, homicide
Weight: 0.37
, rape
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have entertaining videos 1.00
is entertaining 0.91
have videos 0.89
is 6 25 videos 0.81
is video 0.78
is hilarious 0.77
be funny 0.76
is funny 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(act, is 6 25 videos)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(murder, have entertaining videos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(act, is 6 25 videos)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(act, is 6 25 videos)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rape, be funny)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(act, is 6 25 videos)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(murder, have entertaining videos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rape, be funny)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(rape, be funny)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(murder, have entertaining videos)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(murder, have videos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(murder, have videos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(murder, is video)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(murder, have videos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(murder, is video)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(murder, is video)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(murder, is video)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(murder, have videos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(murder, have entertaining videos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(act, is 6 25 videos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(rape, be funny)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(murder, have entertaining videos)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(act, is 6 25 videos)