music: be read by person who play instrument

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rock music
Weight: 0.69
, entertainment
Weight: 0.64
, pop
Weight: 0.64
, opera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings chamber music
Weight: 0.79
, classical music
Weight: 0.72
, pop music
Weight: 0.71
, jazz
Weight: 0.66
, loud music
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be read by person who play instrument 1.00
be sing or play on instrument 0.90
be help by instrument 0.87
be play with musical instrument 0.85
be created by instrument or human voice 0.83
has only one representative of each instrument 0.81
be created by musical instrument 0.80
be play on violin 0.79
be play on piano 0.79
be play by musician 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chamber music, has only one representative of each instrument)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chamber music, has only one representative of each instrument)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chamber music, has only one representative of each instrument)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(music, be read by person who play instrument)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(music, be created by instrument or human voice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(music, be created by instrument or human voice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(music, be created by instrument or human voice)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(music, be created by instrument or human voice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(music, be read by person who play instrument)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(music, be read by person who play instrument)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(music, be read by person who play instrument)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chamber music, has only one representative of each instrument)