musician: be at show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents entertainer
Weight: 0.74
, artist
Weight: 0.68
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, child
Weight: 0.63
Siblings guitarist
Weight: 0.80
, pianist
Weight: 0.71
, rapper
Weight: 0.68
, mike
Weight: 0.67
, violinist
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at show 1.00
show his work 0.85
show toy to friend 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, show his work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(musician, be at show)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(entertainer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(musician, be at show)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(entertainer, be at show)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(artist, show his work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(entertainer, be at show)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(artist, show his work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(entertainer, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(musician, be at show)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, show his work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(musician, be at show)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(musician, be at show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(musician, be at show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(musician, be at show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(entertainer, be at show)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(artist, show his work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(entertainer, be at show)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(musician, be at show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(artist, show his work)