musician: use rugs on stage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents entertainer
Weight: 0.74
, artist
Weight: 0.68
, performer
Weight: 0.64
, child
Weight: 0.63
Siblings guitarist
Weight: 0.80
, pianist
Weight: 0.71
, rapper
Weight: 0.68
, mike
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
use rugs on stage 1.00
have rugs on stage 0.99
use rugs 0.94
have rugs 0.93
stand on rugs 0.93
put down rugs 0.92
have carpets on stage 0.90
use persian rugs 0.88
stand on oriental rugs 0.87
have carpets 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(guitarist, have rugs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(guitarist, stand on rugs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(guitarist, have rugs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(guitarist, have rugs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(guitarist, stand on rugs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(guitarist, stand on rugs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(musician, use rugs on stage)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(musician, stand on rugs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(musician, stand on rugs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(musician, stand on rugs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(musician, stand on rugs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(musician, use rugs on stage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(musician, use rugs on stage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(guitarist, have rugs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(musician, use rugs on stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(guitarist, stand on rugs)