mute swan: has physical part wing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.64
, swan
Weight: 0.57
, wildlife
Weight: 0.52
Siblings black swan
Weight: 0.40
, trumpeter swan
Weight: 0.38
, heron
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wing 1.00
is wing span 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mute swan, has physical part wing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(swan, has physical part wing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(swan, has physical part wing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(mute swan, has physical part wing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mute swan, has physical part wing)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mute swan, is wing span)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, is wing span)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mute swan, is wing span)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(mute swan, is wing span)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has physical part wing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mute swan, has physical part wing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(swan, has physical part wing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mute swan, has physical part wing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(swan, has physical part wing)