mutt: is healthier

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.52
, person
Weight: 0.50
, comic strip
Weight: 0.42
, name
Weight: 0.42
Siblings puppy
Weight: 0.33
, beagle
Weight: 0.33
, dog poop
Weight: 0.33
, dog food
Weight: 0.33
, poodle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is healthier 1.00
be healthier than purebreds 0.78
has quality better 0.76
is smarter 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dog food, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(dog food, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dog food, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mutt, is healthier)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mutt, is smarter)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mutt, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mutt, is smarter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mutt, is smarter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mutt, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mutt, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(mutt, be healthier than purebreds)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is smarter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mutt, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is healthier)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mutt, is healthier)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mutt, is healthier)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dog food, has quality better)