my word: is table splitting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents anything
Weight: 0.47
, lamp
Weight: 0.34
Siblings nothing
Weight: 0.30
, everyone
Weight: 0.30
, read book
Weight: 0.29
, anyone
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is table splitting 1.00
split in word 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(my word, is table splitting)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(my word, split in word)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(my word, split in word)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(my word, split in word)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(my word, split in word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(my word, is table splitting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(my word, is table splitting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(my word, is table splitting)