na: be bad at league

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rapper
Weight: 0.54
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.53
, element
Weight: 0.51
, act
Weight: 0.49
Siblings ra
Weight: 0.33
, nas
Weight: 0.33
, paul simon
Weight: 0.32
, taj mahal
Weight: 0.32
, leo
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at league 1.00
be bad at league of legends 0.88
be bad playing 0.79
be bad at esports 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(na, be bad at league)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad at league of legends)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(na, be bad at league of legends)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(na, be bad at league of legends)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(na, be bad at league of legends)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(na, be bad at esports)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(na, be bad at esports)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad at esports)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(na, be bad at esports)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(na, be bad playing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad playing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(na, be bad playing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(na, be bad playing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(na, be bad at league)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(na, be bad at league) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(na, be bad at league)