nacho: be at hockey game

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.60
, favorite
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, mexican food
Weight: 0.52
Siblings chili
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35
, taco
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, guacamole
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hockey game 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(nacho, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nacho, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hamburger, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at hockey game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nacho, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(nacho, be at hockey game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(nacho, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nacho, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(nacho, be at hockey game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(nacho, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nacho, be at hockey game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(nacho, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at hockey game)