nail polish: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stain
Weight: 0.69
, thing
Weight: 0.66
, paint
Weight: 0.64
, hand
Weight: 0.61
Siblings glitter
Weight: 0.61
, nail
Weight: 0.37
, nail clipper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(glitter, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(glitter, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nail clipper, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(glitter, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(glitter, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(glitter, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(glitter, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(nail polish, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nail polish, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(nail polish, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(glitter, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(glitter, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(nail clipper, has quality good)