nanny: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, child
Weight: 0.54
, baby
Weight: 0.54
, job
Weight: 0.52
Siblings babysitter
Weight: 0.33
, daughter
Weight: 0.33
, girl
Weight: 0.32
, old lady
Weight: 0.32
, toddler
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
has state jobs 0.79
is national 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(babysitter, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(babysitter, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(babysitter, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(nanny, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(nanny, has state jobs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(nanny, has state jobs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(nanny, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nanny, has state jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(nanny, is national)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nanny, is national)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nanny, is national)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nanny, is national)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nanny, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(nanny, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nanny, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(babysitter, has state jobs)