nanotechnology: be related to material science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.65
, field
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.35
, optics
Weight: 0.34
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to material science 1.00
is science 0.85
is difficult science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(computer science, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, be related to material science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, is difficult science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, is difficult science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, is difficult science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(nanotechnology, is science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, is difficult science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be related to material science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be related to material science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be related to material science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)