nanotechnology: be very important

Related concepts

Parents	technology Weight: 0.66 , field Weight: 0.63 , issue Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.59 , science Weight: 0.58
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.36 , solar cell Weight: 0.33 , organic chemistry Weight: 0.33 , silicon Weight: 0.33 , biology Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be very important	1.00
be helpful	0.76
has develop very quickly	0.76
be great	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(technology, be helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be very important)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(technology, be helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be very important)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(science, has develop very quickly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be very important)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(technology, be great) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be very important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(technology, be great)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(science, has develop very quickly)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(technology, be helpful)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(technology, be helpful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(technology, be great)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(science, has develop very quickly)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(technology, be helpful)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(technology, be helpful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be helpful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(technology, be helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(technology, be helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(science, has develop very quickly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(technology, be great) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(computer science, be helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(computer science, be helpful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(nanotechnology, be very important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(nanotechnology, be very important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(science, has develop very quickly)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(technology, be helpful)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(technology, be helpful)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(technology, be great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(computer science, be helpful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(science, has develop very quickly)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(technology, be helpful)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(technology, be helpful)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(nanotechnology, be very important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(technology, be great)