napalm: is effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical weapon
Weight: 0.68
, weapon
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, chemical
Weight: 0.49
, fire
Weight: 0.48
Siblings mustard gas
Weight: 0.35
, sarin
Weight: 0.35
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.34
, nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.34
, pepper spray
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is effective 1.00
was affective 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, is effective)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pepper spray, is effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pepper spray, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(pepper spray, is effective)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(napalm, is effective)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(napalm, was affective)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(napalm, was affective)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(napalm, was affective)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(napalm, was affective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(napalm, is effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(napalm, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pepper spray, is effective)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(napalm, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, is effective)