napkin: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, linen
Weight: 0.55
, accessory
Weight: 0.54
, paper
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tablecloth
Weight: 0.36
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, notepad
Weight: 0.35
, towel bar
Weight: 0.34
, coffee table
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 1.00
be at resturant 0.85
be at hotel 0.80
be at store 0.77
be at furnature store 0.77
be at kitchen and bathroom store 0.77
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(paper, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(linen, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(paper, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(linen, be at hotel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(paper, be at grocery store)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(paper, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(linen, be at hotel)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at grocery store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(paper, be at store)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(coffee table, be at furnature store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(paper, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(linen, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(paper, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(coffee table, be at furnature store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(coffee table, be at furnature store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(napkin, be at restaurant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(napkin, be at restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(napkin, be at resturant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(napkin, be at resturant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(napkin, be at restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(napkin, be at resturant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at resturant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(paper, be at store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(linen, be at hotel)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(paper, be at grocery store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(coffee table, be at furnature store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(paper, be at store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(linen, be at hotel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(napkin, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(paper, be at grocery store)