napoleon: was able

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.60
, emperor
Weight: 0.58
, figure
Weight: 0.58
, pastry
Weight: 0.57
, ruler
Weight: 0.55
Siblings brioche
Weight: 0.33
, waiter
Weight: 0.33
, adam smith
Weight: 0.32
, osama bin laden
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was able 1.00
was wanted 0.82
was forced out of power 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(osama bin laden, was wanted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(osama bin laden, was able)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(osama bin laden, was able)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(osama bin laden, was able)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(osama bin laden, was wanted)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(osama bin laden, was wanted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(napoleon, was able)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was wanted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(napoleon, was wanted)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(napoleon, was wanted)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(napoleon, was wanted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was able)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(napoleon, was able)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(osama bin laden, was able)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(napoleon, was able)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(osama bin laden, was wanted)