nasa: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, institution
Weight: 0.56
, resource
Weight: 0.56
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.32
, mexico city
Weight: 0.32
, santa fe
Weight: 0.32
, columbia
Weight: 0.32
, philippines
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be great place work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(nasa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(columbia, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(nasa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(columbia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(columbia, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(nasa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(nasa, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(nasa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nasa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(nasa, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(nasa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nasa, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(nasa, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(columbia, has quality good)