national park: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national forest
Weight: 0.77
, area
Weight: 0.70
, land
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.69
Siblings grand canyon
Weight: 0.74
, death valley
Weight: 0.69
, beach
Weight: 0.63
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
is dangerous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national park, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(park, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(park, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(beach, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(national park, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(death valley, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(death valley, is dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(grand canyon, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is dangerous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(beach, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(beach, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(national park, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(national park, is dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(national park, is dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(national park, is dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(national park, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national park, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(death valley, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(beach, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national park, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(park, be in danger)