national park: be named yellowstone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national forest
Weight: 0.77
, area
Weight: 0.70
, land
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.69
Siblings grand canyon
Weight: 0.74
, death valley
Weight: 0.69
, beach
Weight: 0.63
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named yellowstone 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(national park, be named yellowstone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(park, be named yellowstone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(park, be named yellowstone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(national park, be named yellowstone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(national park, be named yellowstone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(national park, be named yellowstone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(national park, be named yellowstone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be named yellowstone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(national park, be named yellowstone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be named yellowstone)