national park: be scenic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.69
, city
Weight: 0.69
, area
Weight: 0.61
Siblings death valley
Weight: 0.69
, beach
Weight: 0.63
, glacier
Weight: 0.61
, great barrier reef
Weight: 0.60
, monument
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be scenic 1.00
be beautiful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(national park, be scenic)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(national park, be beautiful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(national park, be beautiful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(national park, be beautiful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national park, be beautiful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(national park, be scenic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(national park, be scenic)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(national park, be scenic)