national parks: be considered national treasures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered national treasures 1.00
be considered treasures 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(park, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(national parks, be considered national treasures)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(park, be considered national treasures)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(park, be considered national treasures)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(park, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(national parks, be considered national treasures)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(national parks, be considered national treasures)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(national parks, be considered treasures)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(national parks, be considered treasures)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national parks, be considered treasures)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be considered treasures)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be considered national treasures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(national parks, be considered national treasures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be considered national treasures)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(national parks, be considered national treasures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be considered national treasures)