national parks: be supposed work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be supposed work 1.00
be supposed fun 0.86
work 0.79
want cancelled 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be supposed fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national parks, be supposed work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be supposed fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(park, be supposed fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be supposed fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(national parks, be supposed work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(yellowstone, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(national parks, be supposed work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be supposed work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(national parks, be supposed work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(park, be supposed fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(yellowstone, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(national parks, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(park, be supposed fun)