national parks: have important sanctuaries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important sanctuaries 1.00
have sanctuaries 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(park, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(national parks, have important sanctuaries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(park, have important sanctuaries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(park, have important sanctuaries)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(park, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(national parks, have important sanctuaries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(national parks, have important sanctuaries)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(national parks, have sanctuaries)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(national parks, have sanctuaries)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(national parks, have sanctuaries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have sanctuaries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have important sanctuaries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(national parks, have important sanctuaries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(park, have important sanctuaries)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(national parks, have important sanctuaries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(park, have important sanctuaries)