national parks: is popular tourist destinations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular tourist destinations 1.00
is tourist destinations 0.99
be popular with visitors 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be popular with visitors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(yellowstone, be popular with visitors)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be popular with visitors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(national parks, is tourist destinations)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(national parks, is tourist destinations)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(national parks, is tourist destinations)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is tourist destinations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(national parks, is popular tourist destinations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be popular with visitors)