native american: were treated in colonial maryland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south america
Weight: 0.76
, american
Weight: 0.70
, america
Weight: 0.69
, native
Weight: 0.52
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.70
, apache
Weight: 0.62
, cherokee
Weight: 0.61
, spanish
Weight: 0.61
, eskimo
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in colonial maryland 1.00
were treated in colonial america 0.94
were treated in maryland 0.90
were treated by british 0.83
were treated in french war 0.82
were treated in america 0.82
were treated in colonies 0.81
were treated in southern colonies 0.80
were treated in pennsylvania 0.80
were treated by spanish 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(american, were treated in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(american, were treated in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(american, were treated in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(native american, were treated in colonial maryland)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in colonial america)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated by spanish)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(native american, were treated by spanish)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(native american, were treated by spanish)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated by spanish)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in pennsylvania)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in southern colonies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(native american, were treated in colonial america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated in america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated in pennsylvania)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(native american, were treated in southern colonies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(native american, were treated in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(native american, were treated in pennsylvania)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(native american, were treated in southern colonies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in pennsylvania)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial america)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in southern colonies)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated in america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(native american, were treated in colonial maryland) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(american, were treated in america)