naturalist: is known for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biologist
Weight: 0.64
, resident
Weight: 0.55
, scientist
Weight: 0.52
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.64
, henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.59
, alfred russel wallace
Weight: 0.52
, botanist
Weight: 0.34
, ecologist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is known for 1.00
is known 0.97
is known as 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(charles darwin, is known)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(charles darwin, is known)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(charles darwin, is known)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(naturalist, is known for)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(naturalist, is known)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, is known)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, is known as)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(naturalist, is known as)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(naturalist, is known)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(naturalist, is known as)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(naturalist, is known)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(naturalist, is known as)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, is known for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(naturalist, is known for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(naturalist, is known for)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(charles darwin, is known)