navigation: be important in websites

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.60
, course
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.59
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, mapping
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, touchscreen
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in websites 1.00
be important on website 0.86
is webpage 0.79
provide internet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(internet service provider, provide internet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(internet service provider, provide internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(internet service provider, provide internet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(navigation, be important in websites)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(navigation, be important on website)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(navigation, is webpage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(navigation, be important on website)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(navigation, is webpage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(navigation, is webpage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(navigation, be important on website)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(navigation, be important on website)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(navigation, is webpage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(navigation, be important in websites)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(navigation, be important in websites)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(navigation, be important in websites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(internet service provider, provide internet)