nebraska: be good place visit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, program
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, team
Weight: 0.55
Siblings texas
Weight: 0.64
, kansas
Weight: 0.35
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.35
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place visit 1.00
be good place live 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be good place visit)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be good place visit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(kansas, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(kansas, be good place visit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(wisconsin, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be good place visit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(arkansas, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(kansas, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(kansas, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wisconsin, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(nebraska, be good place visit)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(nebraska, be good place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nebraska, be good place live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be good place live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(nebraska, be good place visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(kansas, be good place visit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be good place visit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arkansas, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be good place visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(kansas, be good place live)