nebraska: have numbers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, program
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, team
Weight: 0.55
Siblings texas
Weight: 0.64
, kansas
Weight: 0.35
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.35
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have numbers 1.00
have numbers on helmets 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(program, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nebraska, have numbers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(program, have numbers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(program, have numbers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(program, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nebraska, have numbers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(nebraska, have numbers)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, have numbers on helmets)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(nebraska, have numbers on helmets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(nebraska, have numbers on helmets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(nebraska, have numbers on helmets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, have numbers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nebraska, have numbers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(program, have numbers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(nebraska, have numbers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(program, have numbers)