nectarine: rot on tree

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, peach
Weight: 0.60
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.54
, vegetable
Weight: 0.51
, fruit
Weight: 0.50
Siblings tomato
Weight: 0.36
, almond
Weight: 0.36
, apricot
Weight: 0.36
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.35
, grape
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
rot on tree 1.00
go on tree 0.86
fall off tree 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(peach, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nectarine, rot on tree)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(peach, fall off tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nectarine, rot on tree)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(peach, rot on tree)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(peach, fall off tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(peach, rot on tree)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(peach, fall off tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(apricot, fall off tree)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(peach, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(peach, fall off tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(apricot, fall off tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(apricot, fall off tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(nectarine, rot on tree)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nectarine, go on tree)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(nectarine, go on tree)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(nectarine, fall off tree)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(nectarine, fall off tree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(nectarine, fall off tree)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, fall off tree)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(nectarine, go on tree)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, go on tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nectarine, rot on tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(peach, rot on tree)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(peach, fall off tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(apricot, fall off tree)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(peach, rot on tree)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(nectarine, rot on tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(peach, fall off tree)