ned: be short for edward

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.49
, name
Weight: 0.47
, tv show
Weight: 0.45
, boy
Weight: 0.42
, kid
Weight: 0.41
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, ted
Weight: 0.31
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.31
, las vegas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be short for edward 1.00
be short for eddard 0.78
was kelly bad 0.77
is kelly famous for 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ted, be short for edward)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(ted, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ted, be short for edward)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ned, be short for edward)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was kelly bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(ned, was kelly bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(ned, was kelly bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ned, be short for eddard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(ned, be short for eddard)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ned, be short for edward)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ned, be short for edward)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ned, be short for edward) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ted, be short for edward)