ned: was infamous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.49
, name
Weight: 0.47
, tv show
Weight: 0.45
, boy
Weight: 0.42
, kid
Weight: 0.41
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, ted
Weight: 0.31
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.31
, las vegas
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was infamous 1.00
was kelly infamous 0.87
was famous 0.85
is famous 0.81
is famous for 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(albert einstein, was famous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ted, is famous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(albert einstein, is famous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, is famous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(albert einstein, is famous for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(albert einstein, is famous for)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(albert einstein, is famous for)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(albert einstein, was famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(albert einstein, was famous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(las vegas, is famous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is famous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, is famous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, is famous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(albert einstein, is famous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(albert einstein, is famous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ted, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ted, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ned, was infamous)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ned, was kelly infamous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ned, was kelly infamous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ned, was kelly infamous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ned, was kelly infamous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ned, is famous for)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ned, was famous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ned, is famous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ned, was famous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ned, is famous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ned, is famous for)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ned, is famous for)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ned, was famous)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ned, is famous)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ned, is famous for)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ned, was famous)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ned, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ned, was infamous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(albert einstein, was famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(las vegas, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ted, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(albert einstein, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ned, was infamous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(albert einstein, is famous for)