negligence: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents charge
Weight: 0.65
, tort
Weight: 0.63
, cause
Weight: 0.63
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings manslaughter
Weight: 0.34
, child neglect
Weight: 0.34
, heart failure
Weight: 0.33
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, respiratory failure
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
have difficult 0.98
is hard 0.82
is painful 0.77
be important in counselling 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(charge, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(negligence, is difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(charge, have difficult)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(negligence, is difficult)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(failure, is painful)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(negligence, is difficult)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(failure, is hard)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(negligence, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(failure, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(charge, have difficult)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(charge, is difficult)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(failure, is painful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(charge, have difficult)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(charge, is difficult)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(failure, is hard)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(failure, is painful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(charge, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(charge, have difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(failure, is hard)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(failure, is painful)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(negligence, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(negligence, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(negligence, be important in counselling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(negligence, be important in counselling)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(negligence, be important in counselling)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(negligence, be important in counselling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(negligence, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(failure, is hard)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(failure, is painful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(charge, have difficult)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(charge, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(failure, is hard)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(charge, have difficult)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(failure, is painful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(negligence, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(charge, is difficult)