negotiating: be on car

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.52
, topic
Weight: 0.50
, service
Weight: 0.42
, cost
Weight: 0.41
, step
Weight: 0.40
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.31
, meeting
Weight: 0.30
, communicating
Weight: 0.30
, settlement
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on car 1.00
be on car legal 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(negotiating, be on car)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(negotiating, be on car legal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(negotiating, be on car legal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negotiating, be on car legal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(negotiating, be on car legal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(negotiating, be on car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(negotiating, be on car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(negotiating, be on car)