nemesis: have weird names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monster
Weight: 0.48
, goddess
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, planet
Weight: 0.45
Siblings ogre
Weight: 0.32
, villain
Weight: 0.32
, demon
Weight: 0.31
, creature
Weight: 0.30
, obstacle
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have weird names 1.00
have names 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(goddess, have names)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nemesis, have weird names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(goddess, have names)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goddess, have names)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(goddess, have names)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(nemesis, have weird names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(nemesis, have weird names)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(nemesis, have names)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(nemesis, have names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(nemesis, have names)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nemesis, have names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nemesis, have weird names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(nemesis, have weird names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(goddess, have names)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(nemesis, have weird names)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(goddess, have names)