nest: do fall in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.58
, building
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, company
Weight: 0.53
, time
Weight: 0.53
Siblings wasp
Weight: 0.32
, chimney
Weight: 0.32
, moth
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
do fall in love 1.00
keep going 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(time, keep going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nest, do fall in love)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(time, keep going)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(time, keep going)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(time, keep going) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nest, do fall in love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(nest, do fall in love)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nest, keep going)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nest, keep going)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(nest, keep going)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nest, keep going)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(nest, do fall in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nest, do fall in love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(time, keep going)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(nest, do fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(time, keep going)