network: be good

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer network
Weight: 0.83
, security system
Weight: 0.63
, country
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cartoon network
Weight: 0.83
, radio
Weight: 0.62
, node
Weight: 0.62
, telephone
Weight: 0.61
, mastercard
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good 1.00
be used to sell good 0.80
be at great outdoors 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(web site, be used to sell good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(network, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(country, be at great outdoors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(network, be good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(web site, be used to sell good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(country, be at great outdoors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(country, be at great outdoors)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(web site, be used to sell good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(web site, be used to sell good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(network, be good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(country, be at great outdoors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(network, be good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(network, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(network, be good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(network, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(web site, be used to sell good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(country, be at great outdoors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(web site, be used to sell good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(network, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(country, be at great outdoors)