neural network: win at chess

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents algorithm
Weight: 0.75
, system
Weight: 0.67
, network
Weight: 0.67
, brain
Weight: 0.65
Siblings human brain
Weight: 0.72
, neuron
Weight: 0.48
, computer network
Weight: 0.39
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.37
, limbic system
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
win at chess 1.00
be applied win at chess 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(neural network, win at chess)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(neural network, be applied win at chess)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(neural network, be applied win at chess)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(neural network, be applied win at chess)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(neural network, be applied win at chess)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(neural network, win at chess)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(neural network, win at chess)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(neural network, win at chess)