new england: was well suited for town meetings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.74
, country
Weight: 0.65
, north america
Weight: 0.65
, england
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.75
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, vermont
Weight: 0.68
, new orleans
Weight: 0.68
, maine
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was well suited for town meetings 1.00
was better suited than than agriculture 0.78
was better suited for industrial growth 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(new england, was well suited for town meetings)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(new england, was better suited for industrial growth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new england, was better suited than than agriculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(new england, was better suited than than agriculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(new england, was better suited for industrial growth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(new england, was better suited for industrial growth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(new england, was better suited than than agriculture)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new england, was better suited than than agriculture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new england, was better suited for industrial growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new england, was well suited for town meetings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new england, was well suited for town meetings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(new england, was well suited for town meetings)